Read Patrick Barkham on the Nether Edge elm……
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Technotronic on Spring is in the air ianswalkonthewildsid… on Planned sports stadium at Mead… arlenefaymacphersonh… on Planned sports stadium at Mead… ianswalkonthewildsid… on Exotic Newts in the Wildlife… arlenefaymacphersonh… on Exotic Newts in the Wildlife… Archives
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
Categories
Meta
Blog Stats
- 202,855 hits
A letter published by The Star on 8th August 2016
“MANAGEMENT BY NUMBERS”: the unedited version
“Apparently, every time the Council or Amey have something to say about the £2.2bn, city-wide, Streets Ahead highway maintenance PFI project, they mention the NUMBER of trees in the city and the NUMBER of trees planted. They then state that felling thousands of healthy, structurally sound, mature highway trees is justified on the basis that one tree is planted for every tree felled, claiming that the work is necessary to avoid catastrophic losses over a short time period in the future – for the benefit of future generations.
If you have not read the letters that the Save Our Roadside Trees citizen action group have published
(see: http://www.savesheffieldtrees.org.uk/resources-and-links/ or
https://www.stocksbridgecommunity.org/news/street-trees-3-month-ban-all-tree-felling-city ),
you probably believe the Council’s reasoning to be fair and their acts and omissions to be justified. In both cases, you would be wrong.
Managing a tree population for the benefit of communities (present or future) requires a responsible approach that has SUSTAINABILITY as a primary aim. “The UK Forestry Standard (UKFS): The governments’ approach to sustainable forest management” defines what a SUSTAINABLE approach must be. The standard applies to:
“all UK forest types and management systems, INCLUDING THE COLLECTIVE TREE AND WOODLAND COVER IN URBAN AREAS.” It defines the term “forest” as “land under stands of trees with a canopy cover of at least 20%”.
Until 3rd February, 2016, the Council & Amey had always stated that there are over 2 million trees in the city. As of 3rd Feb, a figure of 4m has been repeatedly quoted. This is important because, previously, the Council claimed that the UKFS did not apply to the highway tree population. However, the Council have previously claimed that Sheffield is “10.4% woodland by area”.
Jeremy Gunton is the Council’s Tree Officer; one of two men responsible for drafting the long awaited, much delayed first tree strategy for the city – now 8 months overdue. He explained to me that the figures were “just estimates”. He informed that the 4m figure includes 2.2m trees managed by the Council, with the remainder being an estimate of the NUMBER of trees in private ownership.
TREES OUTSIDE WOODLAND – SUCH AS HIGHWAY TREES – HAVE CONSIDERABLY LARGER CROWNS THAN TREES IN WOODLAND, SO THEY CONTRIBUTE SIGNIFICANTLY MORE TO CANOPY COVER.
In light of the 10.4% claim, assuming it is reasonably accurate, it is reasonable to assume that THE CITY’S CANOPY COVER IS LIKELY TO BE OVER 30%. That means that Sheffield certainly does have an “urban forest” and that the highway tree population is a key component of the urban forest. The UKFS and its guidelines do apply to all tree populations within the urban forest and the UKFS requires that they be managed SUSTAINABLY, through:
‘the stewardship and use of forests and forest lands
in a way, and at a rate, that MAINTAINS… their
potential to fulfil, NOW and in the future,
relevant ECOLOGICAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL FUNCTIONS,
at local, national, and global levels..”
These functions are fulfilled through the provision of a range of valuable ecosystem service benefits that canopy cover affords to the environment (neighbourhoods) and communities (including people). THE RANGE, MAGNITUDE AND VALUE OF THESE BENEFITS IS DEPENDENT ON THE SHAPE, SIZE AND DISTRIBUTION OF CANOPY COVER. The Streets Ahead plan, to fell up to half the population of highway trees (17,528 mature trees), will have REASONABLY FORESEEABLE, HIGHLY LIKELY, SIGNIFICANT, NEGATIVE IMPACTS. It is not a sustainable approach. Contrary to a range of current good practice guidance and recommendations, the Streets Ahead team has neglected to account for these benefits in cost:benefit analyses and risk assessments. Let’s hope they see sense before we experience further serious degradation in the quality of our environment.
MANAGEMENT BY TREE NUMBERS IS INAPPROPRIATE AND CONTRARY TO CURRENT GOOD PRACTICE.”
D.Long (BSc Hons Arb)
SOURCE:
https://www.stocksbridgecommunity.org/comment/534#comment-534
******************************************
NB
It should be noted that, in an e-mail addressed to Save Our Roadside Trees (SORT), dated 17th December, 2015, David Caulfield* stated**:
“IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT YOUR COMMENTS REGARDING ALTERNATIVE ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS ARE CURRENTLY BEING INVESTIGATED BY THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER as part of a formal appeal. In very succinct terms, this is not a case of highway maintenance management by numbers. Clearly IF A SITE SPECIFIC OR BESPOKE SOLUTION CAN BE IDENTIFIED BY EITHER THE COUNCIL OR AMEY’S ARBORICULTURAL SURVEYORS OR HIGHWAY ENGINEERS WHICH CAN BE APPLIED WITH REASONABLE PRACTICABILITY TO RETAIN A TREE THEN WE WOULD LOOK TO DO SO.”
* Mr Caulfield was SCC’s previous Director of Development Services: with overall responsibility for highway trees – he resigned. See:
http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/listen-sheffield-council-sorry-after-highways-chief-s-views-on-tree-felling-recorded-1-7498357
http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/trees-new-council-chief-to-lead-sheffield-felling-confirmed-after-secret-recording-apology-1-7530838
** The SORT letter dated 29th January, 2016 [1] formed part of the Nether Edge petition hand-out that was DISTRIBUTED TO EVERY COUNCILLOR in the city by SCC’s John Turner (Democratic Services Legal and Governance Resources) – on 1st February, 2016 – to encourage informed “debate” at the meeting of full Council, on 3rd February, 2016 ( about responsible, SUSTAINABLE tree population management) [2].
1)
The SORT Letters can be accessed via either of the following links:
https://www.stocksbridgecommunity.org/news/street-trees-3-month-ban-all-tree-felling-city
http://www.savesheffieldtrees.org.uk/resources-and-links/
2)
THE MINUTES OF THE COUNCIL MEETING THAT TOOK PLACE ON 3rd FEBRUARY, 2016 – when the Nether Edge tree action group presented their 6,295 plus signature petition – can be accessed at the following link, under the sub-heading “Minutes of Previous Council Meetings”:
http://sheffielddemocracy.moderngov.co.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=154&MId=6022
Questions about trees are on pages 6 & 7 of the PDF. A redacted version of the petition, followed by the Council’s response, can be found on pages 18 to 24.
The document is of interest because the meeting on the 3rd February, 2016 is the meeting at which the Council, “resolved” to:
“COMMIT TO BE OPEN AND TRANSPARENT WITH THE SHEFFIELD PUBLIC IN ENSURING ALL OUR INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.”
IT WAS AT THIS MEETING THAT THE LEADER OF THE COUNCIL (CLLR JULIE DORE: LABOUR) STATED THAT THE COUNCIL WAS ENTITLED TO TREAT ANY QUESTION THEY RECEIVE AS A FREEDOM OF INFORMATION (FOI) request and then send it to the Information Management Officer to be dealt with.
FELLING: THE TRUTH
SCC & Amey do not comply with current good practice guidance: inadequate ground preparation; inadequate protection; inadequate aftercare. Many of the young trees will fail to last to or beyond five years. SCC do not adequately supervise, monitor, audit or enforce compliance with good practice, so our valuable community assets are destroyed and our resources squandered.
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/full_work_contact_details_for_sc
On the 17th June, 2016, the Council announced that
“OVER 3,800” MATURE HIGHWAY TREES HAD BEEN FELLED
as part of the £2.2bn, city-wide, “transformational” Streets Ahead “improvement” project that claims to deliver BETTER management.
Source: http://www.sheffieldnewsroom.co.uk/tree-injunction-decision/
On 23/7/2015, Steve Robinson (SCC Head of Highway Maintenance) informed that…
THERE WERE ONLY 1,200 TREES THAT WERE DEAD, DYING AND/OR DANGEROUS. “AMEY IDENTIFIED THOSE TREES AND ADDRESSED THOSE FIRST.”
The independent highway tree survey that the Council had done in 2006/2007 which, to quote the SCC Cabinet Member for Environment & Transport: “helps us inform our priorities for the formation of the contract…” stated that Sheffield has 35,057 highway trees and that 25, 877 are mature.
What SCC & Amey have neglected to communicate is that the same survey stated:
****“THERE ARE 25,000 TREES REQUIRING NO WORK AT PRESENT”.****
THE 2006/2007 HIGHWAY TREE SURVEY ONLY RECOMMENDED 1,000 TREES FOR FELLING, with an additional 241 to be crown reduced or to be considered for felling.
THE SURVEY REPORT ALSO ADVISED THAT THE COUNCIL HAVE A
TREE STRATEGY:
“A FORMAL DOCUMENT;
RATIFIED BY THE COUNCIL;
DETAILING POLICIES;
DETAILING BEST PRACTISE [SIC];
DETAILING PROCEDURES;
OUTLINING THE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES”
(No wonder the Streets Ahead team – the Council & Amey – have done their best to avoid publishing the survey report and making it available to the public! See pages 237 – 240 of the SORT letter dated 29th January, 2016 (which only received a response on 16th June, 2016, after over four months!).
The project is highway MAINTENANCE project. Most of the larger trees can be MAINTANED by pruning.
Legally, trees are part of the land. In this case, the highway. The £2.2bn is for HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE.
Most trees are being felled because they are associated with damage to footways and kerbs, and because Amey haven’t got any alternative highway engineering specifications and don’t comply with National Joint Utility Group guidance, or British Standard 5837 (2012). Also, Amey have wrongly led the Council to believe that “mature” means trees are “nearing the end of their natural life”. The Council have wrongly interpreted this as meaning that mature trees are likely to become dangerous in the near future. In truth, mature trees are very susceptible to damage such as can be expected from Amey’s non-compliance with the aforementioned good practice guidance & recommendations.
http://www.savesheffieldtrees.org.uk/resources-and-links/
UNCOVERING THE TRUTH
*****
1)
‘THE SORT STRUGGLE FOR SHEFFIELD’S FIRST TREE STRATEGY: A NEWS ARCHIVE’:
2)
SCC MALFEASANCE & INCOMPETENCE?’
(a letter that Mr Long sent to The Star, dated 31st July 2019. Includes links to audio evidence. NOT PRINTED):
3)
‘SCC / AMEY: DECEIT & MISINFORMATION’
(a letter that Mr Long sent to Sheffield Telegraph, dated 15th November, 2016. NOT PRINTED):
4)
‘AMEY ESAS DO NOT TAKE ACCOUNT OF VALUE OR LOSS OF VALUABLE TREES OR ASSOCIATED BENEFITS’
(Comment from Mr Long, dated 3rd October 2017)
5)
SCC – BROKEN PROMISES & DECEIT’
(word from SCC’s Steve Eccleston – ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LEGAL SERVICES PEOPLE):
6)
‘TREE STRATEGY – WORD FROM THE SCC HEAD OF COUNTRYSIDE AND ENVIRONMENT (JULY 2016) + 2021 UPDATE’:
7)
‘NEWS UPDATE – JULY 2021’:
SHEFFIELD’S FIRST TREE STRATEGY…We’re Still Waiting!
“Campaigners fighting tree felling in Sheffield have been calling for a city-wide tree strategy – but documents reveal one was drafted 14 years ago. …A consultation document for Sheffield’s Tree and Woodland Strategy seen by The Star, which was printed in 2001*, said
‘SHEFFIELD IS BLESSED WITH ONE OF THE FINEST URBAN FORESTS IN THE COUNTRY’ and ‘trees affect everyone’s lives.’ […]
The council did not say why the strategy had not been adopted.”
Reference:
Beardmore, E., 2015. ‘Still room for compromise’ over Sheffield trees debate – says former MP David Blunkett. [Online] Available at: http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/still-room-for-compromise-over-sheffield-trees-debate-says-former-mp-david-blunkett-1-7340615 [Accessed 4 July 2015].
**************************************************************
EXTRACTS FROM THE SORT LETTER DATED 29th January, 2016 (pages 101 & 102)
http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/your-say/action-needs-to-be-taken-1-7964557
The letter, in its entirety, also formed part of Nether Edge petition “hand-out” that was DISTRIBUTED TO EVERY COUNCILLOR IN THE CITY – including Councillors Geoff Smith & Anne Murphy – by SCC’s John Turner (Democratic Services Legal and Governance Resources) , prior to the meeting of full Council on 3rd February, 2016, in Sheffield’s Town Hall.
The SORT letter can be accessed via either of these links:
https://www.stocksbridgecommunity.org/news/street-trees-3-month-ban-all-tree-felling-city
http://www.savesheffieldtrees.org.uk/resources-and-links/
**************************************************************
“…there is a different approach to managing trees and woodlands referred to as URBAN FORESTRY.
[…]
The objective then becomes to manage this resource… TO GAIN MAXIMUM ADVANTAGE FROM IT, FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PUBLIC. Planning and prioritisation of resources are also improved and tree management can be focused at a local neighbourhood level.”
“1.7.1 Urban Forestry and SUSTAINABLE Management
Aim: Provide a tree and woodland resource which is protected and enhanced and MANAGED SUSTAINABLY in accordance with the principles of urban forestry.”
(Lewis, et al., 2001, p. 8)
********************************************************
NOTE: The above quote comes from a Sheffield City Council document. On 26th February, 2016, in Sheffield Town Hall, JERRY GUNTON (Tree Manager within the Countryside & Environment department) – one of the two men tasked by the Council with draughting a tree strategy for the city (the other guy being DAVID ASPINALL, FIRST TASKED WITH DRAUGHTING A TREE STRATEGY OVER A YEAR AGO – ON JULY 23rd, 2015) – stated that ALL COUNCIL DEPARTMENTS ALREADY IMPLEMENT THE “PRINCIPLES OF URBAN FORESTRY” DETAILED WITHIN DOCUMENT. Of course, he was not telling the truth.
************************************************
“SOUND POLICY AND MANAGEMENT INTERVENTIONS can often reverse ecosystem degradation AND ENHANCE THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF ECOSYSTEMS TO HUMAN WELL-BEING…
BETTER INFORMATION CANNOT GUARANTEE IMPROVED DECISIONS, BUT IT IS A PREREQUISITE FOR SOUND DECISION-MAKING”
(Alcamo, et al., 2003, p. 1).
*****************************************************
EXTRACTS FROM THE FORMER (2001) TREE STRATEGY “CONSULTATION DOCUMENT”
(The unadopted, ignored, forgotten strategy)
1.7 STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND AIMS
There are eight proposed Strategic Priorities which, together with associated aims, are fundamental to the success of the Strategy. These are:
1.7.1 URBAN FORESTRY and SUSTAINABLE Management Aim:
Provide a tree and woodland resource which is protected and enhanced and managed SUSTAINABLY in accordance with the principles of URBAN FORESTRY.
1.7.2 Getting the most out of the Resource Aim:
An URBAN FOREST which is productive and of maximum benefit to the public.
1.7.3 Funding Aim:
To increase funding, both internal and external, for implementation of the Strategy.
1.7.4 Working in Partnership Aim:
To create and strengthen partnerships for the future management of the URBAN FOREST and implementation of the Strategy aims.
1.7.5 CONSULTATION AIMS:
To provide all sections of the public with information on tree and woodland management projects and programmes and the opportunity to discuss and comment on proposals.
1.7.6 Improving the Day-to-Day Management of the Resource
Aim:
As far as resources permit, to provide efficient services involved in the management and maintenance of the URBAN FOREST.
1.7.7 Raising Awareness of Trees and Woodlands Aim:
To have a WELL INFORMED PUBLIC AND POLITICIANS, with trees and woodlands given higher priority.
1.7.8 Delivering Council Policies and Government Targets Aim:
A Tree and Woodland Strategy which contributes to the delivery of other relevant Council strategies and policies and government targets.
(Lewis, et al., 2001, pp. 7-8)
REFERENCES:
Alcamo, J., Ash, N., Butler, C. & Callicott, J., 2003. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems And Human Well-being: A Framework For Assessment. [Online] Available at: http://www.unep.org/maweb/en/Framework.aspx [Accessed 26 February 2012].
Lewis, D., Sellwood, N. & Page, M., 2001. Sheffield’s Tree and Woodland Strategy • Consultation Document. Sheffield: Sheffield City Council.
Sheffield’s Tree and Woodland Strategy Consultation Document (2001) can be accessed via this link:
Click to access Lewis%20et%20al_The%202001%20Document%20That%20SCC%20Ignored%20%26%20Rejected_treewoodlandstrategy-scc.pdf
Forestry Commission – Guidance for Local Authorities on Producing a comprehensive Tree Strategy – 2008:
Click to access Forestry%20Commission%20-%20TREE%20STRATEGY%20GUIDANCE%20for%20Local%20Authorities%20-%202008_0.pdf
Also see the ‘Urban Tree Manual’ recently published (19th October 2018) by the Forestry Commission (Forest Research):
https://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/tools-and-resources/urban-tree-manual/
***
12th November 2017:
‘New environmental protections to deliver a Green Brexit’:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-environmental-protections-to-deliver-a-green-brexit
***
13th November 2017:
‘Environment Secretary sets out plans to enhance environmental standards’:
https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/environment-secretary-sets-out-plans-to-enhance-environmental-standards
***
11th January 2018
Policy paper: 25 Year Environment Plan:
‘A Green Future: Our 25 Year Plan to Improve the Environment’, sets out what we will do to improve the environment, within a generation:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/25-year-environment-plan
***
10th March 2018
‘Sheffield Council forced to reveal target to remove 17,500 street trees under PFI deal’:
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/our-region/south-yorkshire/sheffield/sheffield-council-forced-to-reveal-target-to-remove-17-500-street-trees-under-pfi-deal-1-9056942
***
12th March 2018:
‘Half of Sheffield’s trees threatened by controversial highways contract’:
https://www.localgov.co.uk/Half-of-Sheffields-trees-threatened-by-controversial-highways-contract-/44905
***
20th March 2018
‘Sheffield Council confirms contract containing 17,500 tree-felling figure won’t be changed’:
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/sheffield-council-confirms-contract-containing-17-500-tree-felling-figure-won-t-be-changed-1-9072762
***
13th June 2018
‘Sir William Worsley, the new tree champion, will give residents a say on chopping’:
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/sir-william-worsley-the-new-tree-champion-will-give-residents-a-say-on-chopping-lz0993f6r
***
10th July 2018
‘Streets Ahead documents’
(the Information Commissioner forced SCC to make documents, previously classed – wrongly – as ‘commercially sensitive’, publically available:
https://www.sheffield.gov.uk/home/roads-pavements/streets-ahead/streets-ahead-documents.html
The disclosure has revealed a contractual target to fell 17, 500 mature street trees. See:
http://stocksbridgecommunity.org.archived.website/news/sheffield-city-council-announce-felling-17500-street-ttees.html
However, one of the contract documents (‘FIVE YEAR TREE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY’), dated 2012 AD (the start of the £2.2bn contract), previously kept from the public, on the basis that it was ‘commercially sensitive’, does explain that, FROM THE START OF THE CONTRACT, THERE WAS A CLEAR INTENTION TO FELL 17,500 STREET TREES (67.6% of all MATURE street trees) and gives totals for various parts of the city:
South East: 1,370 (445)
South: 2,795 (882)
South West: 3,979 (1,224)
Central: 2,103 (534)
North: 2,420 (715)
North East: 2,939 (763)
East: 1,894 (445)
SOURCE (pages 18 & 19):
Click to access 5%20Year%20Tree%20Management%20Strategy%202012%20Redacted.pdf
The document informs that THE PLAN WAS TO FELL 5,008 TREES DURING THE FIRST FIVE YEARS of the Streets Ahead project. A target figure is provided for each part of the city for each of the 25yrs of the project. The bracketed figures, above, give the target for each part of the city over the first five years of the £2.2 bn highway maintenance contract (to the start of 2018 AD).
***
18th October 2018
‘New advice for councils after Sheffield tree-felling controversy’:
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/new-advice-for-councils-after-sheffield-tree-felling-controversy-1-9403483
‘Sir William Worsley: We must protect our urban trees for a greener future’
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/sir-william-worsley-we-must-protect-our-urban-trees-for-a-greener-future-1-9403504
***
19th October 2018
‘Tree Champion: we must preserve our urban trees ‘:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/tree-champion-we-must-preserve-our-urban-trees
Sheffield’s Tree and Woodland Strategy Consultation Document (2001) can be accessed via this link:
Click to access Lewis%20et%20al_The%202001%20Document%20That%20SCC%20Ignored%20%26%20Rejected_treewoodlandstrategy-scc.pdf
Forestry Commission – Guidance for Local Authorities on Producing a comprehensive Tree Strategy – 2008:
Click to access Forestry%20Commission%20-%20TREE%20STRATEGY%20GUIDANCE%20for%20Local%20Authorities%20-%202008_0.pdf
Also see the ‘Urban Tree Manual’ recently published (19th October 2018) by the Forestry Commission (Forest Research):
https://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/tools-and-resources/urban-tree-manual/
IMPORTANT NEWS
10th August 2017
‘IN FULL: Read the letter demanding the end of tree felling Michael Gove sent to Sheffield Council’:
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/in-full-read-the-letter-demanding-the-end-of-tree-felling-michael-gove-sent-to-sheffield-council-1-8694481
‘IN FULL: Read the letter Sheffield Council sent back to Michael Gove refusing to end tree felling’:
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/in-full-read-the-letter-sheffield-council-sent-back-to-michael-gove-refusing-to-end-tree-felling-1-8696936
‘Stopping Sheffield tree-felling ‘would be morally reprehensible’, claims council’:
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/stopping-sheffield-tree-felling-would-be-morally-reprehensible-claims-council-1-8696881
***
2nd October 2017
‘Michael Gove’s Conservative conference speech, full text’:
https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/10/michael-goves-conservative-conference-speech-full-text/
***
12th November 2017
‘New environmental protections to deliver a Green Brexit’:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-environmental-protections-to-deliver-a-green-brexit
***
13th November 2017
‘Environment Secretary sets out plans to enhance environmental standards’:
https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/environment-secretary-sets-out-plans-to-enhance-environmental-standards
***
11th January 2018
Policy paper: 25 Year Environment Plan:
‘A Green Future: Our 25 Year Plan to Improve the Environment’, sets out what we will do to improve the environment, within a generation:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/25-year-environment-plan
***
10th March 2018
‘Sheffield Council forced to reveal target to remove 17,500 street trees under PFI deal’:
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/our-region/south-yorkshire/sheffield/sheffield-council-forced-to-reveal-target-to-remove-17-500-street-trees-under-pfi-deal-1-9056942
***
12th March 2018:
‘Half of Sheffield’s trees threatened by controversial highways contract’:
https://www.localgov.co.uk/Half-of-Sheffields-trees-threatened-by-controversial-highways-contract-/44905
***
20th March 2018
‘Sheffield Council confirms contract containing 17,500 tree-felling figure won’t be changed’:
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/sheffield-council-confirms-contract-containing-17-500-tree-felling-figure-won-t-be-changed-1-9072762
***
13th June 2018
‘Sir William Worsley, the new tree champion, will give residents a say on chopping’:
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/sir-william-worsley-the-new-tree-champion-will-give-residents-a-say-on-chopping-lz0993f6r
***
23rd June 2018
‘Government ‘tree champion’ makes Sheffield saga a priority after ‘unprecedented’ protests’:
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/government-tree-champion-makes-sheffield-saga-a-priority-after-unprecedented-protests-1-9219165
***
10th July 2018
‘Streets Ahead documents’
(the Information Commissioner forced SCC to make documents, previously classed – wrongly – as ‘commercially sensitive’, publically available:
https://www.sheffield.gov.uk/home/roads-pavements/streets-ahead/streets-ahead-documents.htm l
The disclosure has revealed a contractual target to fell 17, 500 mature street trees. See:
http://stocksbridgecommunity.org.archived.website/news/sheffield-city-council-announce-felling-17500-street-ttees.html
However, one of the contract documents (‘FIVE YEAR TREE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY’), dated 2012 AD (the start of the £2.2bn contract), previously kept from the public, on the basis that it was ‘commercially sensitive’, does explain that, FROM THE START OF THE CONTRACT, THERE WAS A CLEAR INTENTION TO FELL 17,500 STREET TREES (67.6% of all MATURE street trees) and gives totals for various parts of the city:
South East: 1,370 (445)
South: 2,795 (882)
South West: 3,979 (1,224)
Central: 2,103 (534)
North: 2,420 (715)
North East: 2,939 (763)
East: 1,894 (445)
SOURCE (pages 18 & 19):
Click to access 5%20Year%20Tree%20Management%20Strategy%202012%20Redacted.pdf
The document informs that THE PLAN WAS TO FELL 5,008 TREES DURING THE FIRST FIVE YEARS of the Streets Ahead project. A target figure is provided for each part of the city for each of the 25yrs of the project. The bracketed figures, above, give the target for each part of the city over the first five years of the £2.2 bn highway maintenance contract (to the start of 2018 AD).
***
18th October 2018
‘New advice for councils after Sheffield tree-felling controversy’:
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/new-advice-for-councils-after-sheffield-tree-felling-controversy-1-9403483
‘Sir William Worsley: We must protect our urban trees for a greener future’
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/sir-william-worsley-we-must-protect-our-urban-trees-for-a-greener-future-1-9403504
***
19th October 2018
‘Tree Champion: we must preserve our urban trees ‘:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/tree-champion-we-must-preserve-our-urban-trees
Posted at (on 4th Nov 2018):
Also see the following…
VERY IMPORTANT TREE NEWS:
COMMENT FROM STAG FACEBOOK
(Including comment from the Co-Chairman of Sheffield Tree Action Groups – Paul Brooke):
SORT: A NEWS ARCHIVE (mainly video):
More Newspaper Coverage:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/392913244219104/permalink/1111854675658287/
ACT NOW
If you disagree with Sheffield City Council’s reckless, negligent, unsustainable approach to tree population management, please sign the following petition, as Councillors understand voter numbers better than anything else (to the exclusion of almost everything else, in Sheffield):
https://www.change.org/p/sheffield-city-council-streetsahead-sheffield-gov-uk-save-the-12-trees-on-rustlings-road-sheffield
Growing numbers indicate growing, continued support and indicate the reach of media attention and wider support. One thing that Councillors really can’t stand is negative publicity. So, the more they get, the greater the likelihood of positive change and a strategic approach that will help initiate, encourage and support responsible, sustainable management that accords with current, nationally recognised and widely accepted good practice.
The online SORT petition went live on 25th May, 2015. At 12:30am, on 1st July, 2015, the online petition had 4,693 signatures and was supplemented by >5,307 on paper. At the end of 2015, it had 6,047 signatures (supplemented by ~8,800 on paper). Currently, the petition has over 16,000 signatures.
http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/sheffield-trees-we-will-carry-on-our-fight-campaigners-vow-after-no-action-taken-on-10-000-strong-petition-1-7337321
******************************
SCC & AMEY: IGNORANCE
The Council and Amey have been ignoring people for well over a year: since at least May, 2015! (follow the link):
http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/save-our-trees-have-your-say-1-7292659
SCC – BROKEN PROMISES & DECEIT
FROM: ECCLESTON Steve (CEX) [mailto:Steve.Eccleston@sheffield.gov.uk]
Sent: 18 February 2016 16:02
TO: EMMA MONTLAKE
Subject: Dillner v SCC (1) & Amey (IP)
Dear Sir/Madam
Trees & woodland strategy event on Friday 26.2.16
I am advised that a public consultation event is to take place on Sheffield’s wider trees and woodland strategy on 26.2.16. IT SEEMS LIKELY, GIVEN THE CURRENT PUBLICITY AND LITIGATION AROUND HIGHWAYS TREES, THAT CAMPAIGNERS WILL TURN UP INTERESTED IN DEBATING THAT ISSUE.
I HAVE BEEN ASKED TO WRITE TO YOU TO SAY THAT, whilst attendees at the event will be welcome to make written comments on the Council’s policy on street trees, THE COUNCIL CANNOT ENGAGE IN DIALOGUE ON STREET TREES BECAUSE THE EVENT WILL SPECIFICALLY NOT BE DEALING WITH HIGHWAYS TREES in light of the current litigation.
There are two main reasons for this. Firstly, THE STRENGTH OF FEELING ABOUT HIGHWAY TREES IS LIKELY TO SIGNIFICANTLY OVERSHADOW THE CONSULTATION ON NON-HIGHWAY TREES AND WOODLAND ISSUES TO THEIR DETRIMENT and the latter issues require proper consultation in their own right. Also though because the litigation is currently live before the court and the council, as a public authority, has to be careful about what is said by it in public in those circumstances. Judicial Review proceedings tend to reach conclusion in a reasonably quick time frame but, until then, IT SEEMS INAPPROPRIATE FOR THE COUNCIL TO BE DEBATING HIGHWAY TREES WHEN A COURT HAS BEEN ASKED TO RULE ON THE LEGALITY OF THE COUNCILS APPROACH. It is already clear that the council will be defending its position and, once the court has reached its determination, those issues will once again be placed in the public domain.
.
Regards
Steve Eccleston
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LEGAL SERVICES PEOPLE
Legal Services,
Resources,
Sheffield City Council
Telephone: 0114 2735012
Fax: 0114 2736883
Email: Steve.Eccleston@sheffield.gov.uk
http://www.sheffield.gov.uk
Document: 075371/758690
Part or all of the information contained in this document may be subject to legal professional privilege and must not be disclosed without the prior consent of Legal Services. It may be exempt from disclosure by virtue of Section 42 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and Para 10, Sch 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998
*****
PREVIOUSLY…
1)
‘STREET TREES: 3 MONTH BAN ON ALL TREE FELLING IN THE CITY’ (5th February, 2016 – For detail, scroll to the lower end of the page):
https://web.archive.org/web/20170223052853/https://www.stocksbridgecommunity.org/news/street-trees-3-month-ban-all-tree-felling-city
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/streets_ahead_five_year_tree_man_2#comment-87128
2)
FACEBOOK CONTRIBUTIONS BY ANDREW (‘Andi’) WALSHAW (SCC PERFORMANCE & RESEARCH MANAGER [Gatekeeper to the Independent Tree Panel]): https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/streets_ahead_five_year_tree_man_2#comment-87126
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/streets_ahead_five_year_tree_man_2#comment-89369
3)
VERY IMPORTANT TREE NEWS (5yr TMS):
4)
SCC PRESS RELEASE – 2nd February 2016
‘COUNCIL LEADER URGES SUPPORT FOR PLANS TO SAFEGUARD THE FUTURE OF SHEFFIELD’S STREET TREES’:
https://web.archive.org/web/20200116164303/https://sheffieldnewsroom.co.uk/news/council-leader-urges-support-for-plans-to-safeguard-the-future-of-sheffields-street-trees/
https://web.archive.org/web/20200807130333/https://sheffieldnewsroom.co.uk/tag/trees/page/3/
QUOTE:
“On 26 February the Council is launching consultation on its Trees and Woodlands Strategy, which will set out the Council’s commitment to its 170 woodlands AS WELL AS ITS STREET TREES.”
*****
TWO DAYS PRIOR TO THE E-MAIL
5)
THE STAR – Tuesday, 16th February 2016
‘TREES: NEW TREE STRATEGY TO BE REVEALED TO PUBLIC BY SHEFFIELD COUNCIL’:
https://web.archive.org/web/20160217092757/https://www.thestar.co.uk/news/trees-new-tree-strategy-to-be-revealed-to-public-by-sheffield-council-1-7733628
https://www.sheffieldtelegraph.co.uk/news/trees-new-tree-strategy-to-be-revealed-to-public-by-sheffield-council-1-7733628
QUOTE:
“SHEFFIELD COUNCIL BOSSES ARE INVITING THE PUBLIC TO VIEW THE DRAFT OF A NEW TREE STRATEGY…
…WHICH WILL SET OUT HOW IT LOOKS AFTER ALL 2.2M TREES IN THE CITY; INCLUDING THOSE in parks, woodlands, green spaces and ON THE HIGHWAY.
THIS FOLLOWS THE PUBLICATION OF THE ‘FIVE YEARS STREET TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN’ which shows how 36,000 street trees are managed by the Streets Ahead project.
A full-day event will be held at the Town Hall on Friday, February 26 and MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WILL BE ABLE TO VIEW THE DRAFT STRATEGY and speak to members of staff between 10am and 7pm.
The announcement comes just a week after the council said it would cost £26m to save all the trees currently due to be axed in the city. But tree campaigners accused the council of ‘emotional blackmail’ and misleading the public.
Coun Sioned-Mair Richards, cabinet member for neighbourhoods at Sheffield City Council, said:
‘We know that the issue of trees is very important to communities across our city, which is why we’re organising the event in order to share our plans. HIGHWAY TREES ARE PART OF THIS STRATEGY and will be informed by the recently-released Streets Ahead ‘5 year Tree Management Strategy.’”
*****
SUBSEQUENTLY…
6)
‘SUMMARY’:
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/streets_ahead_five_year_tree_man_2#comment-89369
7)
THE YORKSHIRE POST – Wednesday, 14th October 2020
‘SHEFFIELD COUNCIL MISLED PUBLIC AND ACTED WITH ‘LACK OF HONESTY’ OVER TREE-FELLING SCANDAL, DAMNING INVESTIGATION FINDS’:
https://web.archive.org/web/20201014114220/https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/politics/sheffield-council-misled-public-and-acted-lack-honesty-over-tree-felling-scandal-damning-investigation-finds-3002854
*****
MORE FROM STEVE ECCLESTON:
8)
THE LAW SOCIETY GAZETTE – 21st AUGUST 2017:
‘LAWYER IN THE NEWS SOUGHT INJUNCTIONS FOR LOCAL AUTHORITY’:
http://web.archive.org/web/20170821084844/https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/lawyer-in-the-news/sought-injunctions-for-local-authority/5062493.article
9)
The Star – Thursday, 5th March 2020
‘SHEFFIELD COUNCIL MEMBERS ATTEMPTED TO BLOCK EMAILS ABOUT CONTROVERSIAL TREE FELLING PLANS FROM BEING RELEASED’:
10)
Wednesday, 14th October 2020
THE YORKSHIRE POST – ‘SHEFFIELD COUNCIL MISLED PUBLIC AND ACTED WITH ‘LACK OF HONESTY’ OVER TREE-FELLING SCANDAL, DAMNING INVESTIGATION FINDS’:
https://web.archive.org/web/20201014114220/https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/politics/sheffield-council-misled-public-and-acted-lack-honesty-over-tree-felling-scandal-damning-investigation-finds-3002854
A letter from Save Our Roadside Trees (SORT), dated 11th July, 2016, addressed to Simon Green* and David Caulfield**, sent on 11th July, 2016.
*SCC’s Executive Director for the “Place” portfolio, which includes responsibility for the £2.2bn, city-wide, Streets Ahead highway maintenance project.
**SCC’s Director Of Development Services, with overall responsibility for highway trees (as I understand it, Mr Caulfield resigned from SCC early last month).
_______________________________________________________________
“From: SORT
Sent: 11 July 2016 18:03
To: Simon.green@sheffield.gov.uk
Subject: An Acceptable Sub-Strategy for Highway Trees
The DRAFT tree strategy has been delayed several times already. It is NOW OVER SEVEN MONTHS LATE, as it was promised – by Jeremy Gunton and Cllr Fox, at the second meeting of the “bi-monthly” Highway Tree Advisory Forum (HTAF) – to be ready in time for presentation at the next HTAF meeting. The third HTAF meeting was scheduled to happen in NOVEMBER 2015, but was postponed, indefinitely (without the Council or the Streets Ahead team informing anyone), and a new date has yet to be announced.
It is now OVER A YEAR since the council were tasked with drafting a tree strategy, by the previous Cabinet Member for Environment & Transport (Cllr Terry Fox), at the first HTAF meeting, on 23rd JULY, 2015. At that meeting, it was promised that work would begin on it straight away and that it would be ready for MARCH 2016. Months passed. All the while, the Council promised that the tree strategy was being worked on. We were promised that the DRAFT TREE STRATEGY would be presented at the “drop-in” event that took place at the Town Hall on 26th February, 2016. In fact, there was NO DRAFT STRATEGY to comment on. To make matters worse, Mr Gunton informed that work on a draft had not begun and that all Officers – including him – were under strict instructions not to discuss HIGHWAY TREES.
In short, to date, there has not been any opportunity for citizens to comment on a draft strategy. Nor has the Council made any effort, whatsoever, to educate the public about the purpose of and necessity for a tree strategy. No attempt has been made to educate the public, or point them toward information where they can find out more, so that they (we) will be better able to offer meaningful, valuable, informed comment when consultations begin. We were promised that there would be an opportunity for consultation on a draft strategy. To date, that has NOT happened.
FOR SEVEN MONTHS, THE COUNCIL NEGLECTED TO EVEN BEGIN WORK ON A DRAFT TREE STRATEGY AND WILFULLY MISLEAD AND LIED TO CITIZENS. In light of this, and given that we are now told that we cannot expect to see even a DRAFT tree strategy until OCTOBER 2016, it is reasonable that an explanation for the delay should be provided.
On 22nd APRIL, 2016, in a communication to one citizen, it was stated:
“The strategy won’t be drafted until EARLY JUNE at the earliest and an online questionnaire will be available after that probably in LATE JUNE.
It will be online and promoted on our website and social media. The format will be like survey monkey but we haven’t designed it yet. Yes there will be lots of space to put your comments down!!”
You see, a pattern has emerged: every time the Council reaches a deadline, it postpones the deadline by several more months. All the while, the £ 2.2bn, city-wide Streets Ahead, 25yr highway maintenance PFI presses on with its 5yr Core Investment Period resurfacing and lighting works, without a tree strategy to guide and inform policy and decisions.
A SUB-STRATEGY FOR HIGHWAY TREES IS URGENTLY NEEDED, to:
a) Help temper a risk-averse approach; help ensure that acts and omissions are based on sound evidence;
b) Help ensure that appropriate, adequate, BALANCED assessments are undertaken by competent people, using nationally recognised, widely accepted methods and techniques;
c) Help ensure that acts and omissions are PROPORTIONATE, defendable, and auditable;
d) Help ensure that acts and omissions are not unduly influenced by transitory or exaggerated opinions;
e) Help ensure that adequate steps exist to ensure that there is adequate on-site supervision, monitoring and auditing of highway works (particularly those in close proximity to trees, and to trees), and
f) Adequate enforcement of compliance with current good practice and policy commitments;
g) Help foster, encourage and ensure a planned, SYSTEMATIC, INTEGRATED, SUSTAINABLE* approach to the management and care of Sheffield’s URBAN FOREST and the tree populations within various land-use categories that represent its component parts.
*As defined by The UK Forestry Standard: The governments’ approach to sustainable forest management.
The above list is not intended to be comprehensive. For greater detail, please see the SORT letters that you have received previously. They can also be accessed via the following link:
http://www.savesheffieldtrees.org.uk/resources-and-links/
In three weeks, it will be a year since SCC were tasked with producing a tree strategy in time for March, 2016.
As SORT pointed out at the meeting of full council, on 1st July, 2015, there is a current commitment, by SCC, within the “Sheffield’s Great Outdoors: Green and Open Space Strategy 2010-2030″ policy document (on page 15), to produce a “Trees & Woodland Strategy”. This was acknowledged at the first HTAF meeting: presumably in an attempt to get those present to believe that SCC were genuinely committed to ensuring that it would fulfil its promise to have a tree strategy ready for March 2016?
Remember, as late as 9th December, 2015, SORT was informed (via e-mail):
“The draft Trees and Woodlands strategy will hopefully be ready for comment in MARCH next year.”
Trust in the Council and in its credibility is at an all-time low. Openness honesty and transparency is long overdue. THE MINUTES OF THE COUNCIL MEETING THAT TOOK PLACE ON 3rd FEBRUARY, 2016 are available online. Here is an extract:
“At the conclusion of the debate it was moved by Councillor Terry Fox, seconded by Councillor Julie Dore, that this Council:-
[…]
d) COMMITS TO BEING OPEN AND TRANSPARENT WITH THE SHEFFIELD PUBLIC ENSURING ALL RELEVANT INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.”
Citizens have yet to see Sheffield City Council make any attempt to honour that commitment. To date, there has been no change. Please note that we are now aware that THE 2006/2007 HIGHWAY TREE SURVEY that the Council commissioned Elliott Consultancy Ltd to undertake ONLY RECOMMENDED 1,000 TREES FOR FELLING, with an additional 241 to be crown reduced or to be considered for felling. The Survey stated that Sheffield has 35,057 highway trees and that 25, 877 are mature, and stated: “THERE ARE 25,000 TREES REQUIRING NO WORK AT PRESENT”. This is the independent highway tree survey that the previous SCC Cabinet Member for Environment & Transport (Cllr Terry Fox) said:
“HELPS US INFORM OUR PRIORITIES FOR THE FORMATION OF THE CONTRACT…”
He was referring to the Amey PFI Streets Ahead project.
Amey are now felling our healthy, structurally sound, mature highway trees. Most could be safely retained, long-term, through compliance with current good practice (TDAG guidance; BS 5837 [2012]; NJUG guidance & UKRLG guidance), as they are healthy and structurally sound. However, compliance with good practice is not adequately enforced (assuming someone is actually attempting to monitor and enforce) and we have learnt – as a result of a lengthy investigation by the Information Commissioner (case reference: FS50596905), completed on 19th FEBRUARY, 2016 – that neither the Council or the Streets Ahead team have commissioned or drafted any alternative highway engineering SPECIFICATIONS for footway, edging and drain construction, for consideration as a means of safely retaining mature highway trees, long term, prior to taking a decision to fell. Such specifications would be required to evidence compliance with current good practice and help show that felling genuinely is the “last resort” that the Streets Ahead team and Councillors claim it is. Over three and a half years in to a £2.2bn city-wide highway maintenance project that permits the felling of 50% of highway trees, this is reckless and wholly unacceptable.
Please provide a well-reasoned, detailed explanation of why publication of a draft tree strategy has been repeatedly delayed AND please explain why it will take another month or three to complete. Please supply evidence to support each of your assertions. Please also provide a full, complete, current version of the draft strategy as it is now, at the current stage of development.
I look forward to a timely, detailed response.
Yours sincerely,
Save Our Roadside Trees (Representing persons interested, currently numbering 16,000)”
SOURCE:
https://www.stocksbridgecommunity.org/comment/530#comment-530
AN UPDATE TO THE LETTER FROM SAVE OUR ROADSIDE TREES (SORT), dated 11th July, 2016
( http://stocksbridgecommunity.org.archived.website/comment/529.html#comment-529 )
1)
‘SCC LIES & DECEIT’
(In particular, scroll down to item 11c in the References section. Reference 1 includes a link to audio evidence):
2)
‘CONSULTATION – OUGHTIBRIDGE, GRENOSIDE & DEEPCAR’ (scroll down to the ‘Of interest’ section):
3)
‘FLEXI-PAVE & SCC/AMEY CRIMES’:
4)
‘DECEITFUL SCC CABINET MEMBERS & OFFICERS – PEOPLE THAT HAD / HAVE THE FINAL SAY’:
5)
‘CRIMINALITY, GROSS INCOMPETENCE & MALADMINISTRATION’:
6)
‘TEALGATE: EVIDENCE OF GROSS MISCONDUCT BY SCC CABINET MEMBERS & SCC EXECUTIVES’:
7)
‘COUNCIL SHOULD APOLOGISE FOR TREE CONTROVERSY, OMBUDSMAN SAYS’:
https://www.lgo.org.uk/information-centre/news/2020/oct/council-should-apologise-for-tree-controversy-ombudsman-says
https://web.archive.org/web/20201031211947/https://www.lgo.org.uk/information-centre/news/2020/oct/council-should-apologise-for-tree-controversy-ombudsman-says
8)
SCC MALFEASANCE, LIES, SECRECY AND DECEIT – A NEWS ARCHIVE COVERING THE OCTOBER 2020 PERIOD’:
9)
THE STAR – Thursday, 15th October 2015 – ‘SURVEY FINDS SHEFFIELD WAR HERO’S TREE IS ‘HEALTHY’ – CONTRADICTING REASONS FOR FELLING IT’:
10)
‘MORE ON THE TOTLEY DEBACLE’:
11)
‘TODAY – 17th November 2020 – IS THE 4TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE NIGHT RAID ON TREES ON RUSTLINGS ROAD’:
12)
A SHORT DIRECTORY AS RECORD OF THE STREET TREE DEBACLE (items 14 & 15):
13)
13TH JULY 2020 – THE FIRST DAY OF SHEFFIELD TREE WEEK.
14)
‘SHEFFIELD’S URBAN FOREST’
TREE STRATEGY – WORD FROM THE SCC HEAD OF COUNTRYSIDE AND ENVIRONMENT (JULY 2016) + 2021 UPDATE
From: >CHRIS.HEELEY2@sheffield.gov.uk
To: Xxx
CC: >SIMON.GREEN@sheffield.gov.uk
SUBJECT: RE: An Acceptable Sub-Strategy for Highway Trees V2
DATE: Wed, 13 JULY 2016 16:35:01 +0000
Dear Xxx
I am writing in response to the e-mail you sent to SIMON GREEN on the 11th July. I note that you also sent the same e-mail on the same day to DAVID CAULFIELD but that you may have received his “Out of Office” reply.
PLEASE CONSIDER THIS A RESPONSE TO BOTH E-MAILS.
The Trees and Woodlands Strategy was delayed in part by the injunction brought by Mr Dilner earlier this year. Whilst this legal action was unresolved the Council was understandably restricted in its ability to enter into dialog regarding Highway Trees. However, the consultation event held in the Town Hall on the 26th February, not only allowed members of the public to comment on the structure of the wider Trees and Woodlands Strategy but also gave an opportunity to make written comments on the publically available SHEFFIELD STREETS AHEAD 5 YEAR TREE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY. These comments have been fed back to the Streets Ahead team for their consideration as part of THE ANNUAL REVIEW PROCESS OF THAT 5 YEAR STRATEGY.
A draft Trees and Woodlands Strategy will be available in September 2016. THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION THAT WE STARTED IN FEBRUARY THIS YEAR WILL CONTINUE, WITH FURTHER OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE PUBLIC TO COMMENT ON THE DRAFT STRATEGY. I can assure you the Council is still very committed to the promise given in the Green and Open Spaces Strategy (GOSS) to produce a Trees and Woodlands Strategy. I am just as committed to ensure the inclusive way we developed the GOSS is mirrored for our Trees and Woodlands Strategy.
Regards
Chris
CHRIS HEELEY
HEAD OF COUNTRYSIDE AND ENVIRONMENT
Sheffield City Council
>Christopher.heeley@sheffield.gov.uk
0114 2734285 / 07703768769
*****
The above letter was in response to a letter from Save Our Roadside Trees (SORT: Sheffield’s first tree group – founders of the city-wide tree campaign), dated 11th July, 2016, addressed to Simon Green – SCC Executive Director for the ‘Place’ – and David Caulfield – SCC Director of Development Services – ‘Place’ (Billington & Croft’s predecessor], sent on 11th July, 2016):
‘WHERE’S OUR TREE STRATEGY?’:
****
OF INTEREST:
1)
THE STAR – Thursday, 28th April 2016
‘SHEFFIELD CC MALADMINISTRATION, MALFEASANCE & INCOMPETANCE’:
2)
‘UPDATE – LIES & WILLFUL DECEIT BY SCC EXPOSED’:
3)
‘VERY IMPORTANT TREE NEWS’ (5yr TMS):
4)
‘AN E-MAIL FROM THE CO-AUTHOR OF SHEFFIELD’S FIRST ADOPTED TREE STRATEGY’:
5)
‘NEW SCC POLICY’:
6)
SCC, GUNTON & TREECONOMICS – SHEFFIELD’S STREET TREES VALUED AT OVER £340 MILLION’:
7)
‘AFTER A WAIT OF OVER THREE YEARS, THE SHEFFIELD i-TREE ECO REPORT IS NOW AVAILABLE (27th January 2021)’
8)
‘6th ANNIVERSARY OF SCC ‘DEBATE OF THE SORT PETITION’:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/392913244219104/posts/1870252426485171/?comment_id=1871756089668138
9)
‘NEWS – JANUARY & FEBRUARY 2021’:
10)
‘REFERENCES’
To accompany ‘SCC INCONSISTENCY & LACK OF STRATEGIC DIRECTION’:
11)
‘STREET TREE PARTNERSHIP STRATEGY – CONSULTATION FEEDBACK RECOMMENDATIONS APPROVED! (on 20th January 2021)’:
12)
‘SHEFFIELD STREET TREE PARTNERSHIP – 29th July 2020’:
13)
THE YORKSHIRE POST – Monday, 16th August 2021
‘NEW CHAPTER’ FOR SHEFFIELD STREET TREES AFTER BITTER FELLING SAGA AS PARTNERSHIP PLEDGE SIGNED
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/politics/new-chapter-for-sheffield-street-trees-after-bitter-felling-saga-as-partnership-pledge-signed-3347732
http://web.archive.org/web/20210816195005/https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/politics/new-chapter-for-sheffield-street-trees-after-bitter-felling-saga-as-partnership-pledge-signed-3347732
14)
THE SHEFFIELD STREET TREE PARTNERSHIP STRATEGY
(dated May 2021 – not published until 10th August 2021):
http://web.archive.org/web/20210913093515/https://www.sheffield.gov.uk/home/roads-pavements/managing-street-trees.html
Click to access sheffield-street-tree-strategy-2021.pdf
EXTRACTS FROM Cllr Fox’s Speech AT THE MEETING OF FULL COUNCIL ON 1st July, 2015:
“And it’s also welcoming, Lord Mayor, that, as decision-makers in this Town Hall, we have our policies and procedures to scrutinise not by only by us in this place but scrutinised by the public…
We had an independent survey done in 2006-2007 which helps us inform our priorities for the formation of the contract…
THE PROCESS IS THAT AMEY MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL about which trees, in their expert opinion, should be removed by the highway, and in which categories. THE COUNCIL WILL THEN ASSESS EACH INDIVIDUAL TREE FOR THEMSELVES AND THEN MAKE A DECISION ABOUT WHETHER THAT TREE SHOULD BE FELLED OR NOT.
Lord Mayor, sometimes WHEN WE plant and PLANE THE TOPS, we identify that we have root problems or not, is if we have not then we obviously do not take that tree. TAKING THE TREE IS THE LAST RESORT, Lord Mayor.
THE SHEFFIELD HIGHWAY TREE STRATEGY CONSISTS OF THE SIX D’s: dangerous; dead, dying, diseased, damaging and discriminatory.
By incident, Lord Mayor, if I may, on to Rustlings Road. There are over thirty trees on Rustlings Road. … Out of the eleven that have been identified to be felled, three have been noticed, and that ONCE WE DIG UP THE PAVEMENT, as I say, ONCE WE TAKE THAT PLANING OFF, IF THEY CAN BE RETAINED, THEY WILL.
I have said on numerous occasions that ONCE AMEY DESIGNATE THE TREES THEY WANT TO FELL, THE COUNCIL GO AND DO THEIR INDEPENDENT CHECKS. Lord Mayor, ANY FELLING OF A TREE IS A LAST RESORT.
Other, not only cities in England, in Britain, but in Europe are watching how we manage this, Lord Mayor, and I’ve to do that; we have to take everybody with us. As I say, I believe, Lord Mayor, because this is such a delicate and in-depth debate, I’ve suggested the Council will endorse an Highways Tree Forum, where, as we have already heard, so MANY BIG ISSUES NEED TO BE TALKED THROUGH and, also, we are we are not – we are not – able to drive, forget the pun. OUR POLICY IS STILL THAT WE WANT TO CROSS-CHECK THEM, not only with methods in this place, but WITH LOCAL RESIDENTS AND LOCAL CONSERVATION GROUPS.
Lord Mayor, I’D LIKE TO CONGRATULATE THESE, ERR, CAMPAIGNERS, RESIDENTS AND PEOPLE who feel very strongly about our city, BECAUSE WITHOUT THEM, Lord Mayor, WE WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO DELIVER OUR PROJECTS together.”
Source:
https://www.stocksbridgecommunity.org/comment/177#comment-177
THE MINUTES OF THE COUNCIL MEETING THAT TOOK PLACE ON 1st JULY 2015 (when SORT presented their petition: 4,693 signatures online plus an additional >5,307 on paper), can be accessed at the following link, under the sub-heading “Minutes of Previous Council Meeting”:
http://sheffielddemocracy.moderngov.co.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=154&MId=6016
Councillor Fox (Cabinet Member for Environment and Transport – Labour) was given five minutes to respond to a three minute speech given by the Save Our Rustlings Trees (SORT) campaign (which actually took 3 minutes and forty-four seconds). Cllr Fox took 12 minutes and eleven seconds to deliver his 5 minute speech.
IMPORTANT NEWS ARCHIVE
(Government intervention by the Secretary of State for Environment, Food And Rural Affairs and his appointed ‘Tree Champion’: Sir William Worsley)
***
10th AUGUST 2017
‘Exclusive – Michael Gove demands end to Sheffield tree-felling’:
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/our-region/south-yorkshire/sheffield/exclusive-michael-gove-demands-end-to-sheffield-tree-felling-1-8694453
‘IN FULL: Read the letter demanding the end of tree felling Michael Gove sent to Sheffield Council’:
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/in-full-read-the-letter-demanding-the-end-of-tree-felling-michael-gove-sent-to-sheffield-council-1-8694481
‘IN FULL: Read the letter Sheffield Council sent back to Michael Gove refusing to end tree felling’:
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/in-full-read-the-letter-sheffield-council-sent-back-to-michael-gove-refusing-to-end-tree-felling-1-8696936
‘Stopping Sheffield tree-felling ‘would be morally reprehensible’, claims council’:
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/stopping-sheffield-tree-felling-would-be-morally-reprehensible-claims-council-1-8696881
‘Michael Gove demands end to Sheffield tree-felling programme’
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/aug/10/michael-gove-sheffield-tree-felling
***
11th AUGUST 2017
‘Michael Gove tells Sheffield council to stop destroying hundreds of trees’:
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/stop-destroying-hundreds-of-trees-michael-gove-urges-sheffield-0x7pptklz
***
14th AUGUST 2017
‘Halt to Sheffield tree felling requested by Michael Gove ‘would hit city taxpayers’, says council’:
https://www.thestar.co.uk/news/halt-to-sheffield-tree-felling-requested-by-michael-gove-would-hit-city-taxpayers-says-council-1-8702314
***
28th SEPTEMBER 2017
‘Gove seeking legal measures against “bonkers” Sheffield street tree felling’:
https://www.hortweek.com/gove-seeking-legal-measures-against-bonkers-sheffield-street-tree-felling/arboriculture/article/1445866
‘Michael Gove seeking way to end ‘bonkers’ felling of Sheffield trees’
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/sep/28/michael-gove-seeking-way-to-end-bonkers-felling-of-sheffield-trees
‘Michael Gove meets Sheffield Green Councillor, STAG and Wildlife Trust respresentatives’:
https://sheffieldgreenparty.org.uk/2017/09/28/michael-gove-meets-sheffield-green-councillor-stag-and-wildlife-trust-respresentatives/
2nd OCTOBER 2017
‘Michael Gove’s Conservative conference speech, full text’:
https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/10/michael-goves-conservative-conference-speech-full-text/
***
12th NOVEMBER 2017
‘New environmental protections to deliver a Green Brexit’:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-environmental-protections-to-deliver-a-green-brexit
***
13th NOVEMBER 2017
‘Environment Secretary sets out plans to enhance environmental standards’:
https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/environment-secretary-sets-out-plans-to-enhance-environmental-standards
***
11th JANUARY 2018
‘Policy paper: 25 Year Environment Plan: A Green Future: Our 25 Year Plan to Improve the Environment, sets out what we will do to improve the environment, within a generation’:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/25-year-environment-plan
***
10th MARCH 2018
‘Sheffield Council forced to reveal target to remove 17,500 street trees under PFI deal’:
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/our-region/south-yorkshire/sheffield/sheffield-council-forced-to-reveal-target-to-remove-17-500-street-trees-under-pfi-deal-1-9056942
***
12th MARCH 2018
‘Half of Sheffield’s trees threatened by controversial highways contract’:
https://www.localgov.co.uk/Half-of-Sheffields-trees-threatened-by-controversial-highways-contract-/44905
***
13th MARCH 2018
‘Michael Gove renews calls for Sheffield Council to reconsider “unnecessary destruction of trees” ’:
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/michael-gove-renews-calls-for-sheffield-council-to-reconsider-unnecessary-destruction-of-trees-1-9061585
***
20th MARCH 2018
‘Sheffield Council confirms contract containing 17,500 tree-felling figure won’t be changed’:
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/sheffield-council-confirms-contract-containing-17-500-tree-felling-figure-won-t-be-changed-1-9072762
***
13th JUNE 2018
‘Sir William Worsley, the new tree champion, will give residents a say on chopping’:
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/sir-william-worsley-the-new-tree-champion-will-give-residents-a-say-on-chopping-lz0993f6r
***
23rd JUNE 2018
‘Government ‘tree champion’ makes Sheffield saga a priority after ‘unprecedented’ protests’:
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/government-tree-champion-makes-sheffield-saga-a-priority-after-unprecedented-protests-1-9219165
***
9th JULY 2018
‘GUIDANCE URBAN FORESTRY: Find out about trees and forests in and around urban areas – their benefits and ways to protect and manage them’
(first launch of a Government urban forestry webpage, published by the Forestry Commission):
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/urban-forestry
***
10th JULY 2018
‘STREETS AHEAD DOCUMENTS’
(the Information Commissioner forced SCC to make documents, previously classed – wrongly – as ‘commercially sensitive’, publically available):
https://www.sheffield.gov.uk/home/roads-pavements/streets-ahead/streets-ahead-documents.html
The disclosure has revealed a contractual target to fell 17, 500 mature street trees. See:
http://stocksbridgecommunity.org.archived.website/news/sheffield-city-council-announce-felling-17500-street-ttees.html
However, one of the contract documents (‘FIVE YEAR TREE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY’), dated 2012 AD (the start of the £2.2bn contract), previously kept from the public, on the basis that it was ‘commercially sensitive’, does explain that, FROM THE START OF THE CONTRACT, THERE WAS A CLEAR INTENTION TO FELL 17,500 STREET TREES (67.6% of all MATURE street trees) and gives totals for various parts of the city:
South East: 1,370 (445)
South: 2,795 (882)
South West: 3,979 (1,224)
Central: 2,103 (534)
North: 2,420 (715)
North East: 2,939 (763)
East: 1,894 (445)
SOURCE (pages 18 & 19):
Click to access 5%20Year%20Tree%20Management%20Strategy%202012%20Redacted.pdf
The document informs that THE PLAN WAS TO FELL 5,008 TREES DURING THE FIRST FIVE YEARS of the Streets Ahead project. A target figure is provided for each part of the city for each of the 25yrs of the project. The bracketed figures, above, give the target for each part of the city over the first five years of the £2.2 bn highway maintenance contract (to the start of 2018 AD).
The SCC website provides access to a document named ‘STREETS AHEAD CONTRACT’ (PDF 1MB), dated 31st July 2012:
Click to access Contract.pdf
On page 164 of the PDF (page 154 of the document), at ‘Part G – The Services’, it states:
“THE SERVICE PROVIDER SHALL PROVIDE THE SERVICE continuously throughout the Term: 31.1.1 IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOOD INDUSTRY PRACTICE…”
For comment, see:
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/good_industry_practice#comment-85382
***
1st OCTOBER 2018
‘Well-Managed Highway Infrastructure: A Code of Practice’ (CoP):
http://www.ukroadsliaisongroup.org/en/codes/index.cfm
First published on 28th October 2016, by the UK Roads Liaison Group, on 1st October 2018, AFTER A TWO YEAR PERIOD OF GRACE for highway engineers to adapt to conform, this CoP superseded all previous codes (‘Well-maintained Highways’, ‘Well-lit Highways’ and ‘Management of Highway Structures’).
QUOTE:
“A.9.9.3. Authorities should recognise the contribution THAT TREES MAKE TO THE ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL WELL-BEING OF THE COMMUNITY.
In urban areas roadside trees have a particular LANDSCAPE VALUE, are often highly regarded by the community, and should be carefully managed. […]
CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN TO AVOID DAMAGE TO TREES DURING HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENT WORKS and
guidance for the planning, installing and maintenance of utility services in proximity to trees issued by NJUG should be followed.”
***
18th OCTOBER 2018
‘New advice for councils after Sheffield tree-felling controversy’:
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/new-advice-for-councils-after-sheffield-tree-felling-controversy-1-9403483
‘Sir William Worsley: We must protect our urban trees for a greener future’
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/sir-william-worsley-we-must-protect-our-urban-trees-for-a-greener-future-1-9403504
***
19th OCTOBER 2018
‘Tree Champion: we must preserve our urban trees’:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/tree-champion-we-must-preserve-our-urban-trees
‘URBAN TREE MANUAL’ (published by the Forestry Commission: Forest Research:
https://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/tools-and-resources/urban-tree-manual/
***
FOR VIDEO FOOTAGE OF THE CITY-WIDE CAMPAIGN initiated and developed by Sheffield’s first tree group – Save Our Roadside Trees (formerly known as Save Our Rustlings Trees), see:
***
FOR SORT COMMUNICATIONS, see:
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/how_has_the_wood_from_recent_tre#comment-83837
https://stocksbridgecommunity.org.archived.website/news/sheffield-city-council-announce-felling-17500-street-ttees.html
***
FOR NEWS ON THE FLOOD PROTECTION PROPOSALS, set to cost £93 MILLION, see:
Click to access Flood%20Protection%20Consultation_29th%20September_2016..pdf